Animal Rights Group Sues Developers of $300 Million Windmill Project for Violating Endangered Species Act

It’s enough to drive you batty.  Wind turbines kill endangered Indiana bats.  Result:  one special interest group (bat lovers) sues another special interest group (green energy lovers).  It should be interesting.  

Court House News:  “A federal judge in Maryland ordered project developers to stop building wind turbines along Appalachian ridgelines in West Virginia until they got a federal permit allowing the ‘incidental take’ 0f endangered Indiana bats. ‘It is uncontroverted that wind turbines kill bats, and do so in large numbers,’ wrote Judge Roger Titus.  The underlying case, filed last June by the Animal Welfare Institute, Mountain Communities for Responsible Energy and David Cowan, accused turbine construction companies Beech Ridge Energy and Invenergy Wind of violating the Endangered Species Act by harming endangered Indiana bats.”

Sacha Baron Cohen Sued for Libel in Movie Bruno

A man who was depicted as a terrorist in Sacha Baron Cohen’s movie “Bruno” sued Mr. Cohen and others for libel and slander in a lawsuit filed in the District of Columbia.  Ayman Abu Aita in seeks $110 million in damages from Cohen and other defendants, including David Letterman.

The Fights and Suits over the Fighting Sioux

Wall St. Journal:  “Some three-and-a half-years ago, the LB blogged about a lawsuit filed by the University of North Dakota against the NCAA, fighting the NCAA’s directive that the school stop using ‘Fighting Sioux’ as its mascot.   The school was swimming against the tide of others that had, over the years, halted the practice of using Native Americans as mascots (see, e.g., Stanford, Arkansas State).   In a piece out Wednesday, the NYT updates the story, with details of a new lawsuit over the matter.”

Are Breast Implants and Donated Organs Marital Assets?

Legal Blog Watch:  “ac·ri·mo·ni·ous di·vorce (ăk’rə-mō’nē-əs dĭ-vôrs):  A legal dissolution of a marriage accompanied by a request that the former spouse’s breast implants or donated organs be treated as marital assets. Okay, I made that definition up, but you must admit that things are getting a bit out-of-hand in divorce proceedings when the husband demands that the $5,500 spent on his wife’s breast implants be counted as marital assets, entitling him to additional property in the breakup (and then takes this claim to the state’s Supreme Court when the lower court mocks him).”

Go to Top