DEA’s Medical Marijuana – The Facts

Here is the text of the Drug Enforcement Agency’s flyer called “Medical Marijuana – The Facts”:

  • Medical marijuana already exists. It’s called Marinol.

  • A pharmaceutical product, Marinol, is widely available through prescription. It comes in the form of a pill and is also being studied by researchers for suitability via other delivery methods, such as an inhaler or patch. The active ingredient of Marinol is synthetic THC, which has been found to relieve the nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy for cancer patients and to assist with loss of appetite with AIDS patients.

  • Unlike smoked marijuana–which contains more than 400 different chemicals, including most of the hazardous chemicals found in tobacco smoke-Marinol has been studied and approved by the medical community and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nation’s watchdog over unsafe and harmful food and drug products. Since the passage of the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act, any drug that is marketed in the United States must undergo rigorous scientific testing. The approval process mandated by this act ensures that claims of safety and therapeutic value are supported by clinical evidence and keeps unsafe, ineffective and dangerous drugs off the market.

  • There are no FDA-approved medications that are smoked. For one thing, smoking is generally a poor way to deliver medicine. It is difficult to administer safe, regulated dosages of medicines in smoked form. Secondly, the harmful chemicals and carcinogens that are byproducts of smoking create entirely new health problems. There are four times the level of tar in a marijuana cigarette, for example, than in a tobacco cigarette
  • Morphine, for example, has proven to be a medically valuable drug, but the FDA does not endorse the smoking of opium or heroin. Instead, scientists have extracted active ingredients from opium, which are sold as pharmaceutical products like morphine, codeine, hydrocodone or oxycodone. In a similar vein, the FDA has not approved smoking marijuana for medicinal purposes, but has approved the active ingredient-THC-in the form of scientifically regulated Marinol.

  • The DEA helped facilitate the research on Marinol. The National Cancer Institute approached the DEA in the early 1980s regarding their study of THC’s in relieving nausea and vomiting. As a result, the DEA facilitated the registration and provided regulatory support and guidance for the study.

  • The DEA recognizes the importance of listening to science. That’s why the DEA has registered seven research initiatives to continue researching the effects of smoked marijuana as medicine. For example, under one program established by the State of California, researchers are studying the potential use of marijuana and its ingredients on conditions such as multiple sclerosis and pain. At this time, however, neither the medical community nor the scientific community has found sufficient data to conclude that smoked marijuana is the best approach to dealing with these important medical issues.

  • The most comprehensive, scientifically rigorous review of studies of smoked marijuana was conducted by the Institute of Medicine, an organization chartered by the National Academy of Sciences. In a report released in 1999, the Institute did not recommend the use of smoked marijuana, but did conclude that active ingredients in marijuana could be isolated and developed into a variety of pharmaceuticals, such as Marinol.

  • In the meantime, the DEA is working with pain management groups, such as Last Acts, to make sure that those who need access to safe, effective pain medication can get the best medication available.

July 16, 2010, Columns on Arizona’s Immigration Law

1.  Phoenix Business Journal:  “Arizona sheriffs could countersue Obama administration over immigration law

2.  Washington Examiner:  “Holder should drop the Arizona suit”

“The injury is the time and money Holder is wasting by suing a state for passing a statute that repeats, almost word for word, existing federal law — on the flimsy grounds that it pre-empts federal authority to police the border, something the feds are doing only haphazardly now. The insult is Holder’s implication that Arizona law enforcement officers will racially target Hispanics even though the law specifically prohibits them from doing so.”

3.  Michell Malkin:  “Stand with Arizona: National Immigration Policy Summit

“Here’s a great way to support Arizona with your tourism dollars — and participate in grass-roots immigration enforcement activism. On July 30-31, Stand with Arizona and other groups will hold a National Immigration Policy Summit in Phoenix.”

4.  Arizona Republic:  “Fund to help Arizona sheriffs with immigration legal battles

5.  Michell Malkin:  “Hmmm: What’s Washington planning at our southern border?

6.  Phoenix New Times:  “SB 1070 Showdown at the Sandra Day O’Connor Courthouse, Round One

7.  Fox News:  “Officer Sues Over Arizona Immigration Law

8.  Phoenix New Times:  “Welcome to Mi Pueblito: The Small-Town, Family-Farm Lifestyle That We Cherish Is Being Preserved Thanks to Mexican Immigrants

July 15, 2010, Columns on Arizona’s Immigration Law

1.  National Review:  “The Radicalism of the Anti-Arizona Suit”

“To make the case that the Arizona immigration law conflicts with, and therefore is preempted by, federal law, the Justice Department has to make an extraordinary claim — that the federal laws as written don’t matter so much.”

2.  National Review:  “Respecting the Law”

“The rule of law is indispensable for America and its immigration policy. . . . Respect for the rule of law seems natural to most Americans, but it is largely an anomaly in the history of other nations. Nowhere is this more evident than in Latin America.”

3.  National Review:  “Bullets across the U.S.–Mexican Border”

“Illegal immigration affects the entire United States. But the Southwest now has an even more immediate problem: bullets whizzing across the border.”

4.  Phoenix Business Journal:  “Police union irked by Phoenix chief’s opposition to immigration law

5.  Arizona Republic:  “Brief for 9 states backs Arizona immigration law”  Michigan, Alabama, Florida, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas and Virginia joined in the brief supporting Arizona.

6.  Arizona Republic:  “S. Dakota files brief supporting Arizona immigration law

7.  Arizona Republic:  “Selig: Arizona’s immigration law is not a baseball issue

8.  Arizona Republic:  “Arizona immigration law opens farm jobs to unemployed

9.  Arizona Republic:  “Lawyers ponder Arizona immigration law’s impact

10.  Arizona Republic:  “Judge to hear lawsuit vs. Arizona’s immigration law

11.  Los Angeles Times:  “Immigration now a top concern among Latinos, poll shows

Go to Top