NY Post:  If Congress had to name laws honestly, it would be called the “Forcing Your Internet Provider to Spy On You Just In Case You’re a Criminal Act of 2011” — a costly, invasive mandate that even the co-author of the Patriot Act, Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.), says “runs roughshod over the rights of people who use the Internet.”

But because it’s disguised as the “Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers Act,” the House Judiciary Committee approved it last week by a wide margin — even though it’s got little to do with child porn and won’t do much to protect kids.

The centerpiece of this ill-conceived law is a sweeping requirement that commercial Internet providers retain a one-year log of all the temporary Internet Protocol addresses they assign to their users, along with customer-identification information. The Justice Department says this will help track down child-porn peddlers by linking online activity and real-world identities.  But the government would be able to access that sensitive data for all kinds of investigations, most of which would have nothing to do with child porn.
 

Related posts:

  1. Kalifornians: Kiss Your 100-watt Lightbulb Goodbye
  2. The Protection Against Unreasonable Search And Seizure And The US Supreme Court
  3. Light Bulb Restrictions Begin January 1, 2012
  4. Eleventh Circuit Decision Largely Eliminates Fourth Amendment Protection in E-Mail
  5. 9th Circuit Court Rules Government Has a Right to Use GPS to Track All Citizens w/o Probable Cause
  6. Court Orders Anonymous GQ Blogger and Accused Hacker to be Identified
  7. You Can Thank Congress for the $60 Light Bulb
  8. Having Solved all of Our Problems, Congress Now Considering Potty Parity
  9. Dirty Jokes on Sex Harassment Plaintiff’s Computer Ruled Fair Game
  10. Does Attaching a Thumb Drive to a Shared Computer Waive Fourth Amendment Rights in its Contents?