Estate of Denial: The Occupy Wall Street movement is shining a spotlight on how much influence big-money interests have with the White House and Congress.  But people are not talking about how big money is also increasingly getting its way with the courts, which is too bad. It’s a scandal that needs more attention. A blistering new report details how big business and corporate lobbyists are pouring money into state judicial elections across the country and packing the courts with judges who put special interests ahead of the public interest.

A case in point: West Virginia. In 2007, the West Virginia Supreme Court, on a 3-2 vote, threw out a $50 million damage award against the owner of a coal company. Funny thing: the man who would have had to pay the $50 million had spent $3 million to help elect the justice who cast the deciding vote. The West Virginia ruling was so outrageous that in 2009 the United States Supreme Court overturned it. But that was unusual. In most cases, judges are free to decide cases involving individuals and groups that have paid big money to get them elected. (MORE: Justice on Display: Should Judges Deliberate in Public?)

Related posts:

  1. Court OKs Suing Power Companies for Global Warming
  2. Department of Justice Prohibits Nonpartisan Elections
  3. Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Ban of Smoking on Stage
  4. Study Finds 201 Cases Where Judges Ruled U.S. Justice Department Violated Law or Ethics Rules Prosecuting Crimes
  5. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Walmart in Class Action Suit
  6. O’Connor Warns Lawyers and Judges of Judicial Funding Threat
  7. Supreme Court Could Impact 2012 Elections
  8. Federal Appeals Court Demands DOJ Explain Obama’s “Judicial Activism” Comment
  9. ABA Calls Obama’s Comments on Judicial Activism ‘Troubling’
  10. New EPA Regs Kill Coal Powered Power Plants