The New York Times , in its story called “In Health Bill, Obama Attacks Wealth Inequality,” does not hide the ball about one of the little discussed purposes of Obamacare – redistribution of income.  The story says:

“The bill that President Obama signed on Tuesday is the federal government’s biggest attack on economic inequality . . . .”

Redistribution of income is a nice way of saying take from those that have and give to those that do not have.  It’s Robin Hood practiced by the federal government.  Note that the U.S. Constitution does not say that the federal government may use Robin Hood tactics.  It’s the economic equivalent of dumbing down of all the students practiced by the U.S. education system.

See the editorial in the Washington Times called “No Obamacare for Obama – Democrats exempt themselves from socialist medicine.”

Related posts:

  1. New Health-Care Taxes Help Obama Spread the Wealth
  2. Timeline of Tax Provisions in the House Health Care Bill
  3. Reconciliation Bill Adds Even More Taxes
  4. CBO Says Obama’s Deficits Will Exceed 90% of GDP By 2020
  5. Florida Suit Poses a Challenge to Health Care Law
  6. What to Expect in Next Year’s Health Benefits Offerings
  7. ObamaCare Success: Health Insurers Stop Writing Policies for Kids
  8. Obamacare vs. the Rule of Law
  9. Obamacare is Even Worse than Critics Thought
  10. Obamacare is for the Little People: McDonald’s, 29 other Firms get Health Care Coverage Waivers