Law.com:  “The First Amendment does not insulate animal rights activists from criminal liability when they use an Internet Web site to orchestrate a campaign of harassment, cyberattacks, vandalism and destruction of property, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.”  The convicted defendants “invite its supporters ‘to engage in electronic civil disobedience against Huntingdon and various companies associated with'” their victim, Huntingdon Life Sciences, an animal testing firm.

Related posts:

  1. The Channon Christian & Chris Newsom Murders
  2. Angry Texts Turn Into Illegal Threats
  3. Gender-Equity Cops Want to Favor Women Over Men in the Sciences
  4. Pledge of Allegiance in Schools Ruled Constitutional on Appeal
  5. 9th Circuit Court Rules Against Harkins Theaters & Says Movies Must be Accessible to Hearing & Visually Impaired
  6. Appeals Court Rules against Plano Principals in Candy Cane Case
  7. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Voids Arizona Law on Voter Proof of Citizenship
  8. 8th Circuit Permits NFL Lockout
  9. Federal Asset Seizures On The Rise
  10. Portion of Defense of Marriage Act Struck Down by 1st Circuit